It is possible for students to obtain advanced degrees in English while knowing little or nothing about traditional scholarly methods. The consequences of this neglect of traditional scholarship are particularly unfortunate for the study of women writers. If the canon — the list of authors whose works are most widely taught — is ever to include more women, scholars must be well trained in historical scholarship and textual editing. Scholars who do not know how to read early manuscripts, locate rare books, establish a sequence of editions, and so on are bereft of crucial tools for revising the canon.
To address such concerns, an experimental version of the traditional scholarly methods course was designed to raise students’ consciousness about the usefulness of traditional learning for any modern critic or theorist. To minimize the artificial aspects of the conventional course, the usual procedure of assigning a large number of small problems drawn from the entire range of historical periods was abandoned, though this procedure has the obvious advantage of at least superficially familiarizing students with a wide range of reference sources. Instead students were engaged in a collective effort to do original work on a neglected eighteenth-century writer, Elizabeth Griffith, to give them an authentic experience of literary scholarship and to inspire them to take responsibility for the quality of their own work.
Griffith’s work presented a number of advantages for this particular pedagogical purpose. First, the body of extant scholarship on Griffith was so tiny that it could all be read in a day; thus students spent little time and effort mastering the literature and had a clear field for their own discoveries. Griffith’s play The platonic Wife exists in three versions, enough to provide illustrations of editorial issues but not too many for beginning students to manage. In addition, because Griffith was successful in the eighteenth century, as her continued productivity and favorable reviews demonstrate, her exclusion from the canon and virtual disappearance from literary history also helped raise issues concerning the current canon.
The range of Griffith’s work meant that each student could become the world’s leading authority on a particular Griffith text. For example, a student studying Griffith’s Wife in the Right obtained a first edition of the play and studied it for some weeks. This student was suitably shocked and outraged to find its title transformed into A wife in the Night in Watt’s Bibliotheca Britannica. Such experiences, inevitable and common in working on a writer to whom so little attention has been paid, serve to vaccinate the student — I hope for a lifetime — against credulous use of reference sources.
1. The author of the text is primarily concerned with
[A] revealing a commonly ignored deficiency.
[B] proposing a return to traditional terminology.
[C] describing an attempt to correct a shortcoming.
[D] assessing the success of a new pedagogical approach.
2. It can be inferred that the author of the text expects that the experience of the student mentioned as having studied Wife in the Right would have which of the following effects?
[A] It would lead the student to disregard information found in the Bibliotheca Britannica.
[B] It would teach the student to question the accuracy of certain kinds of information sources when studying neglected authors.
[C] It would teach the student to avoid the use of reference sources in studying neglected authors.
[D] It would help the student to understand the importance of first editions in establishing the authorship of plays.
3. Which of the following best states the “particular pedagogical purpose” mentioned in lines 1-2, paragraph 3?
[A] To assist scholars in revising the canon of authors.
[B] To minimize the trivial aspects of the traditional scholarly methods course.
[C] To provide students with information about Griffith’s work.
[D] To encourage scholarly rigor in students’ own research.
4. Which of the following best describes the function of the last paragraph in relation to the text as a whole?
[A] It summarizes the benefits that students can derive from the experimental scholarly methods course.
[B] It provides additional reasons why Griffith’s work raises issues having to do with the cannot of authors.
[C] It provides an illustration of the immediate nature of the experiences students can derive from the experimental scholarly methods course.
[D] It contrasts the experience of a student in the experimental scholarly methods course with the experience of a student in the traditional course.
5. It can be inferred that the author of the text considers traditional scholarly methods courses to be
[A] irrelevant to the work of most students.
[B] inconsequential because of their narrow focus.
[C] unconcerned about the accuracy of reference sources.
[D] too wide-ranging to approximate genuine scholarly activity.
参考答案:CBDCD
推荐阅读
更多>>1 略读 粗略地阅读语言材料的面式阅读法,通过略读获取阅读材料的主要内容和大意。快速阅读时,训练学生略读文章标题判断预测主要内
一、紧扣主题,中心鲜明 紧扣主题是重中之重,是整个作文的主线,如果偏离主题的话即使再好的修饰,再好的语句结构,最多给你一个安
1 Practice makes perfect 熟能生巧。 2 God helps those who help themselves 天助自助者。 3 Easier said than
take a the chance 冒风险;碰运气 take after与……相像 take apart拆开;剖析;粗暴对待 take care小心,当心; take
关系代词(在句中作主语、宾语或定语) 1 that既可代表事物也可代表人,which代表事物;它们在从句中作主语或宾语,that在从句中作宾
阅读排行榜
相关内容